Tuesday, May 03, 2005

the truth about lust

first the good thing about lust - it's almost as strong a bond as love; maybe even stronger, since it's far more tangible. you can see, feel, smell, sense, touch, taste it; it can burn in your veins and make you tremble with desire and want and need.

now for the not-so-good-news - lust lasts even less than love. of course love fades just as certainly, but it makes a more determined effort to hang around and be sociable. lust, now she's a selfish mistress. one fine day - poof! i know this for a fact, and i know this to my cost. three relationships, each where can't-keep-hands-off-each-other was a given, suddenly turned to dust because the lust took a hike.

of course it helped too. each of these three times the same thing happened. one fine day i found myself no longer turned on by the man - usually very suddenly - and almost instantly, the rest of the relationship went cold too. obviously there wasn't much to these relationships, because they didn't survive the departure of lust.

now lets take married man, the one i'm having an affair with. he and i used to be wild and crazy and almost constantly sexual; each conversation turned to sex, we sent erotic msgs and graphic descriptors of what we'd like to do to each other, we shared fantasies, we were just a lot about sex. but over the past few months - i'd say 4-5 months - he's been less 'physical' in every way. we're honest enough with each other for him to tell me if he was sleeping with another woman, so i know it's not that. what it is is that the sex doesn't mean as much to him now as other things do. sex in general is taking a backseat in his mind and life currently but our relationship hasn't suffered for that at all. i'm relieved, i'm intrigued and i'm curious to see where this goes.

Sunday, May 01, 2005

the truth about fidelity

i'm in a good position to talk about fidelity, i think. i've been unfaithful, had people be unfaithful to me, and am condoning someone else's unfaithfulness at the moment.

that's the strange thing about fidelity - you have to have been unfaithful to discuss it with any kind of realism. otherwise, you're an idealist who has the noble idea, but you're in no position to talk about it with certainty.

till a few years ago, i was 100% convinced that every single human being can be faithful if they want to be; that people who make excuses for their infidelity are doing just that - making excuses. i still believe that. what i don't believe anymore is that fidelity is something to aspire to above all else in a relationship. sure, it's very important, but even more so is total, complete, brutal honesty. it can make your relationship survive what nothing else can.

also, the whole definition of fidelity is suspect. mostly, faithfulness seems to be about sex - get physical with anyone other than your partner and you're unfaithful. but what about an intense, close relationship that's not physical? what about sharing your deepest thoughts and concerns and passions with someone other than your partner? what about chat sex, or phone sex? what about lusting after someone else all the time? can you ignore all of these and feel hurt only when your partner sleeps with someone else? does the fact that someone else is privy to his or her deepest feelings and emotions not cause as much hurt? what is fidelity, then?

that's my point. fidelity, like everything else, is not black-and-white. and the moment you've got shades of grey, you've got trouble.

Saturday, April 30, 2005

tales about fidelity

for two years now i've been having an affair with a married man. he's married, i'm single, and we live in different cities. i know a lot of people are in such relationships, but there's something very unusual, even odd, about ours - apart from the fact that it's an extra marital relationship i mean.

most such 'affairs' i've come across are either casual and hands-off, like a one-night stand; or deep and emotional, like any other long-term relationship, except that in this case they're hidden. in our case, neither description is true.

for one, we're great friends - possibly each other's closest friends in many ways. he trusts me a hundred percent and i feel the same. it's a deep, abiding, strong bond. secondly, we're very attracted to each other physically - the sex is fantastic, wild and unhibited. now this should mean we try to get together every chance we get. yet, he often comes into my city and leaves without us meeting because he's here on work and very busy. also, often, days go by without us talking or communicating in any way. no constant lover-like communciation.

then, there's his marriage. from what i know, they aren't one of those couples who have no relationship with each other and just live together for appearances sake. they have a very real family, kids, parents, relatives, movies, vacations, jokes, friends, work - the works. he's never made the typical excuses or any excuses at all about his marriage - you know, the she-doesnt-understand-me-at-all routine, or the we-live-together-but-it's-only-for-the-sake-of-parents/children/etc speech. yes, like with most relationships/marriages, she's not everything he would want her to be; i'm sure she feels the same about him. but we're not pretending that he and i are the real thing and she and he are just for convention/convenience etc.

yet, there's me and him. we're not emotional about our involvement, or possessive about it. but it's certainly significant to both of us, and not just for the sex, because if it were, we'd be making an attempt to see each other a lot more than we do.

in a nutshell, here's the situation. there's a reasonably happily married man nevertheless having an affair with a woman in another city who's a close friend and lover; they're both very involved with each other but not 'in love' and they don't expect anything from the relationship. they don't seem to give each other anything tangible but they don't give each other up either.

add to this the angle that this guy once had a one-night stand with another woman. he immediately told me. did it kill me? no. did it bother me at all? sure did. but i can deal with it. and how did he feel about it? guilty? yes. guilty towards his wife, and guilty towards me. he's obviously not able to tell his wife but he's able to tell me. i know anyone reading this is likely to say you moron, how can you see that as a good sign; the fact that the man can cheat on you and tell you. seen through the eyes of logic and decent behaviour, i'm sure this comes up pretty short. all i know is that we have no commitment of any sort to each other, so i appreciate that he tells me the truth, and that even without a commitment he feels a sense of responsibility to our relationship. likewise for me. i tell him when i date other men; and if and when i sleep with any of them. i don't know if it bothers him - i've never asked and he's never said. but it makes me a little guilty when i do, even though he doesn't expect me to be celibate.

what does that make this relationship - apart from very complex, of course? many people would tell me it makes me an idiot and both of us immoral scums-of-the-earth. all i can say is that if two otherwise ethical, honest, straightforward people can do what we do and not be consumed by guilt; if we can be brutally honest and yet totally accepting of each other, i'm not ready to write us off as lowlives so easily.

Sunday, April 24, 2005

the truth about truth

it's easy to tell the truth about love. love is honourable, after all. but what about immorality. sexuality. infidelity. extra-marital relationships. the reality is that honesty flies out the window about the same time that honour does.

the truth about love

love has to be the most abused word in the language. i love that dress, i love this book, i love my parents, i would love to take a holiday, i'm in love with... we're so free with our emotions that it's possible to use the same word to describe how one feels about a man and a skirt.

i'm also really amazed by this whole obsession people have with being in love. like their careers, falling in love is an objective for most people - something to aspire to. and it starts earlier and earlier - i mean, for the average teenager now, coupledom is cooler than being single.

me, i'm very wary of this love thing. sure, i believe it can exist, but falling in love is certainly nowhere as easy as it's made out to be. the chances of feeling something stronger than attraction, more permanent than lust and deeper than need are very slim - and i'm totally convinved that unless what you feel is separate from all these three elements, it ain't love.

that apart, i've got a few theories about love. here's how i see it.

1. love doesn't last. forever-ever-after is an aberration, if it happens at all. i think love is as inconsistent as the rest of our lives. you can be madly in love one year, and not remember the man/woman's name a few years later.

2. 'true love' is about as rare as Hailey's Comet. my theory is that it can exist only with total lack of expectation, and without the wish to 'possess' or be with the loved one. 99% of us are too selfish/self-centered to feel it.

3. when it comes to love, women's lib/men's lib/chauvinism etc are all bullshit. you do what's needed for the good of the one you love. whether or not it's good for you is incidental. it doesn't make you a wimp or a walkover.

there's more, of course. love is too complex to be dismissed in 3 points. more in another edition of the truth files.

Saturday, April 23, 2005

telling it like it is

nothing but the truth goes in here. which is why it goes in anonymously. the truth causes too much devastation to be told with a byline